Image
Press Release
Haub Law Opens Food Pantry on Campus Aiming to Eliminate Barriers to Student Success
The Elisabeth Haub School of Law has established a Food Pantry program on campus available to students and their families who need food assistance. The pantry, which has well-stocked locations in both the Wellness Center and Dannat Hall at the Law School, was made possible by generous donations from alumni and local organizations.
This initiative was implemented by the Office of Student Services in response to the Law School’s increased awareness of students who struggle with food insecurities, rent, and other necessities exacerbated by the pandemic. In collaboration with the Law School’s Development Office, and with support from members of the Student Bar Association (SBA), Haub Law will be able to continue to stock the pantry with shelf-stable food items.
“Food insecurity is a real concern for many students and their families who are already making major sacrifices to pay for a higher education,” said Angie D’Agostino, Dean for Students at Haub Law. “We’re still seeing the impact of the pandemic now.”
According to a Spring 2021 Law School Survey of Student Engagement surveying 13,000 law students nationwide, 43% reported they had increased concerns about having enough food, almost 63% were more worried this past year about their ability to pay bills, and more than 29% had increased concerns about eviction and housing loss.
“Law school can be difficult for any student,” said Dean D’Agostino. “But for those with loans running out, who have real concerns about paying their tuition or rent, the added pressure can be a barrier to success. Through our food pantry, we will have a means to help alleviate this stress so students can focus on pursuing their paths to a successful career.”
Haub Law’s food pantry, located in Aloysia 109 and the Common Room in Dannat Hall, is available to any student needing food assistance. To learn more about this initiative, or make a donation, email the Office of Student Services or make a gift online (Select "Designations," choose "Other," and indicate "Haub Law Food Pantry").
More from Pace
In the Media
Law Professor Bennett Gershman provides expert legal analysis to amNewYork on the distinction between New York City’s corporation counsel and chief counsel. Gershman explains that while the Law Department represents the city in litigation, the chief counsel serves as the mayor’s personal legal adviser, operating under attorney-client privilege on sensitive policy and legal matters— and New York Metropolitan Magazine has the story.
In the Media
In her recent op-ed published in the Albany Times Union, Pace Haub Law Professor Bridget J. Crawford examines a new federal tax rule that would allow tipped workers to claim a deduction—unless their tips come from what the Treasury Department defines as “pornographic activity.” Professor Crawford argues that this exclusion is not a question of morality, but of labor and tax fairness, warning that it disproportionately harms the modern digital workforce, especially women who earn income through subscription-based platforms. She notes that creators on sites like OnlyFans and Fansly are already taxed as independent contractors and receive 1099s like other freelancers, raising a critical question: why should one group of tipped workers be denied a benefit available to everyone else? “Tax policy should meet women where they actually work, not exclude them from deductions,” writes Professor Crawford. “The IRS’s job is to review income, not to judge women’s bodies or the way they earn a living. Women working in digital creator spaces deserve the same neutrality, fairness and access to deductions that the tax code offers other workers.”
In the Media
The Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic is featured in a recent Sierra Magazine article examining the successful effort to protect the 1011 2nd Avenue Forest, one of the last remaining waterfront forests in Troy, New York. In the case, the Clinic provided pro bono representation challenging the City of Troy’s environmental review and rezoning decisions, arguing that the City improperly issued a negative declaration under New York’s State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and failed to adequately assess potential environmental and cultural impacts of the proposed development. As Managing Attorney Todd Ommen notes in the piece, the case reflected the Clinic’s core mission: representing environmental groups in matters where legal advocacy can play a critical role in protecting the natural environment.