Pace University News

Haub Law Professor Bridget Crawford speaks with CNN about the growing normalization of creator-based platforms like OnlyFans, explaining that tax reporting and formalized income structures help many creators view their work as legitimate labor and “like any other worker.” Crawford, whose research examines the economics behind OnlyFans, weighs in as the platform increasingly enters mainstream cultural conversations.

Pace Energy and Climate Center Director Michael Hamersky speaks with The Footprint about proposed legislation that would make it easier for New Yorkers to install residential battery storage systems. Hamersky explains that modern battery technology is far safer than many people realize, noting that public concerns are often based on outdated assumptions tied to e-bike and scooter battery fires rather than newer home energy systems. He argues that expanding battery storage could help reduce reliance on fossil fuels, strengthen grid resilience, and lower energy costs for residents using solar power.

Dyson Professor Seong Jae Min pens an op-ed in The Korea Times examining the growing threat of AI-generated deepfakes and misinformation during election cycles. Comparing South Korea’s aggressive regulatory response with the more fragmented approaches in the United States and Europe, Professor Min argues that deepfakes are becoming a serious challenge for democratic systems while raising difficult questions about balancing regulation with free expression.

Haub Law Professor Bennett Gershman is featured in Injustice Watch. Professor Gershman raises concerns about efforts to tighten standards for certificates of innocence in wrongful-conviction cases, warning that requiring “irrefutable” proof would set an unrealistically high bar for exonerated individuals seeking relief.

In an article by NJ Today, Bennett L. Gershman, a legal ethics professor at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, weighed in on allegations involving financial relationships connected to Chief Justice John Roberts’s household. Gershman’s analysis concluded that, even under a narrow interpretation of judicial recusal standards, the circumstances could lead a reasonable person to question the Chief Justice’s impartiality in cases involving related parties.